← back to No Bad Baby Names

Data Notes

Why do pre-1935 records look two-thirds female?

While analyzing 100+ years of American baby names, we noticed that... 67% of babies born in 1910 were girls?! That can't be right. The biological sex ratio at birth is approximately 105 males per 100 females, or about 51% male, and has been consistent across human populations throughout recorded history.[1][2][3][4]

Sex ratio over time showing female over-representation in early data

Here's the key insight: The Social Security Administration wasn't established until August 14, 1935. The pre-1935 data is retroactively compiled from people who later applied for Social Security cards and reported their birth information.[5] This creates a significant sampling bias:

OK, but why were girls over-represented in early data rather than boys?

Our guesses:

How this affects our work at nobadnames.com

We'll be cautious with pre-WWII data. However, the early name counts can still still useful: Even if the sample is biased, trends in which names were popular can still be informative. Additionally, we'll use metrics scaled by sex in some of our analyses.

Thanks for reading!


References

[1] Grech, Victor. "The Sex Ratio at Birth." Early Human Development, vol. 91, no. 12, 2015, pp. 817-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.10.009

[2] Mathews, T.J., and Brady E. Hamilton. "Trend Analysis of the Sex Ratio at Birth in the United States." National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 53, no. 20, CDC, 2005. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr53/nvsr53_20.pdf

[3] Orzack, Steven Hecht, et al. "The Human Sex Ratio from Conception to Birth." PNAS, vol. 112, no. 16, 2015, pp. E2102-E2111. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416546112

[4] Catalano, Ralph, et al. "Exogenous Shocks to the Human Sex Ratio: The Case of September 11, 2001 in New York City." Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 12, 2006, pp. 3127-3131.

[5] Social Security Administration. "Background Information for the Social Security Area Population." https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/background.html

[6] The first monthly Social Security benefits were paid beginning in January 1940, though lump-sum payments began in 1937. Social Security Administration. "Social Security History: FAQ." https://www.ssa.gov/history/hfaq.html

[7] Arias, Elizabeth. "United States Life Tables, 2003." National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 54, no. 14, CDC, 2006. Table 12. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_14.pdf

[8] Hacker, J. David. "New Estimates of Census Coverage in the United States, 1850-1930." Social Science History, vol. 37, no. 1, 2013, pp. 71-101.

[9] DeWitt, Larry. "The Decision to Exclude Agricultural and Domestic Workers from the 1935 Social Security Act." Social Security Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 4, 2010. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v70n4/v70n4p49.html

[10] National Center for Health Statistics. "History and Organization of the Vital Statistics System." CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/about_nvss.htm